Facts: CJ hired firm after receiving a complaint from a former patient. The patient reported that CJ gave her the wrong medication and it caused her to become ill and require hospitalization. The patient reported this to CJ’s employer and the employer reported it to BON. Outcome: The firm requested the investigative file from BON. After review …
Case Results and Hallmark Achievements
Our results speak for themselves. In case after case, the attorneys at our Texas-based law firm have successfully helped clients resolve a wide range of complicated legal matters involving professional license defense, medical license defense, and vocational license defense. We know how to build a strong case to protect your license – and your livelihood. To read what some of our satisfied clients have to say about us, please visit our testimonials page.
Call TodayTexas Board of Nursing v. RK
Facts: RK hired firm after receiving a complaint from a former patient. The patient filed the complaint with the Board and alleged that RK incorrectly reported that she had HIV, forged records, did not report that she see her primary care physician (PCP), offered to take her to the doctor herself and did not report the …
Texas Department of State Health Services v. SR
Facts: Our client, SR, hired us to defend him against a complaint filed with the Texas Department of State Health Services by a biased personal acquaintance alleging SR had violated confidentiality requirements as a paramedic for a municipality. The complainant filed this groundless accusation to retaliate and obtain an advantage in a separate dispute. The invalid …
Texas Board of PT Examiners v. KJ
Facts: KJ hired firm after receiving a complaint from a former patient. The patient filed the complaint with the Board and alleged that KJ failed to assess the patient’s status, allowed the unlicensed practice by technicians and committed fraudulent billing practices. Outcome: The firm provided a response to the complaint, breaking down each allegation. Regarding the failure …
Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board v. JT
Facts: Our client, JT, hired us to defend him against a complaint filed with the Board by a quasi-governmental entity alleging he had violated minimum professional standards for real estate appraisers. He faced damage to his professional reputation, his ability to obtain work from appraisal management companies, lenders and other clients, potential disciplinary action from the …
Texas Behavioral Health Executive Council v. NJ
Facts: Our client, NJ, hired us to defend her against two complaints filed with the Council by a former disgruntled employee and another state agency alleging she had violated minimum professional standards in her practice as a marriage and family therapist. The invalid complaints threatened to damage her professional reputation, ability to obtain future employment, potential …
Texas Behavioral Health Executive Council v. JS
Facts: JS engaged our firm to defend her career and reputation against unlicensed practice of counseling allegations. Our client faced revocation of her credentials and damage to her highly regarded reputation in the community. Outcome: The firm evaluated the available evidence and submitted a robust response addressing both the facts and applicable law. We demonstrated that the …
Texas Executive Council of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Examiners v. APP
Facts: Our client, APP, hired us to defend him against a complaint filed with the Board by a former employer alleging he had violated minimum professional standards as in his physical therapy practice by logging a treatment session during a period that was inaccurate. The invalid complaint threatened harm to APP’s professional reputation, his ability to …
C.S. & M.H. v. W.G.
Our Client, a funeral service director, was alleged to have breached the standard of care. Following dismissal of the complaint by the Funeral Service Commission, the complainants have pursued a civil claim against our Client. In the latest of a series of victories, the Firm has filed a MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT against the Plaintiffs. …
E.R.G. v. R.V.
Following an aggressive deposition campaign conducted by the Firm, the parties have begun initial discussions that may lead to settlement of the case. The Firm intends to take the lead in brokering this arrangement. If successful, this proposed settlement could save our client substantial resources at an early juncture in the case.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- …
- 20
- Next Page »