Facts: Our client, FD hired us to assist in obtaining his Texas nursing license after he passed the NCLEX. Our client passed the NCLEX but after the four year period established by the Board and as a result the Board denied his nursing license. Outcome: The firm evaluated the relevant documentation, enabling statutes and Board …
Case Results and Hallmark Achievements
Our results speak for themselves. In case after case, the attorneys at our Texas-based law firm have successfully helped clients resolve a wide range of complicated legal matters involving professional license defense, medical license defense, and vocational license defense. We know how to build a strong case to protect your license – and your livelihood. To read what some of our satisfied clients have to say about us, please visit our testimonials page.
Call TodayCity Council v. HEPE
Facts: HEPE hired firm after they were denied a permit to operate by the city council. The city had not been enforcing certain city ordinances regarding operation and was issuing some operations permits in error of the ordinances. HEPE appealed and asked to be given a permit since they had been operating without issue since 2020 …
Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation v. ZZ
Facts: ZZ hired firm after receiving 2 complaints. These were ZZ’s 3rd and 4th complaints overall during her time as a massage therapist and massage establishment owner. The allegations in the new complaint were essentially identical to the allegations in ZZ’s 1st and 2nd complaints. The allegations involved employing unlicensed workers, not keeping records and allowing people to sleep at …
Texas Board for Physical Therapy Examiners v. MA
Facts: MA received a complaint from a former patient. The patient alleged that MA injured her back and side during a session. Outcome: The firm provided a robust response including all medical records from the patient’s file showing that MA only met with the patient on 2 minor occasions and that the patient’s issues were ongoing over …
School District v. CA
Facts: Client hired firm after she was put on leave by her school district. The district placed her on paid leave to finish out the remainder of the school year. CA was placed on leave after it was alleged that she pushed a student down a flight of steps. CA provided a statement prior to hiring …
Texas Medical Board v. WD
Facts: WD hired firm to assist in the submission of his application for licensure with TMB. WD had several criminal issues that he needed to report and provide records for. WD had 4 prior arrests, one deferred adjudication and one conviction all related to alcohol. Outcome: The firm crafted responses to several questions on the TMB application …
Texas Behavioral Health Executive Council v. BT
Facts: BT received a complaint and hired firm to assist in responding to the complaint and pending investigation. It was alleged that BT practiced without supervision in violation of BHEC rules and statutes which prevent LPC-As from practicing without the supervision of a LPC. BT practiced without supervision for almost 6 months before the complaint was …
Texas State Board of Public Accountancy v. DK
Facts: Our client, DK, who is a certified public accountant, hired us to defend him against a complaint filed with the Board by a former client who claimed he would not communicate with him to aid in the resolution of tax issues created by DK. DK was facing a serious threat to his professional reputation, harm to …
Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board v. AM
Facts: Our client, AM, who is a certified real estate appraiser, hired us to defend him against a complaint filed with the Board by a government-sponsored entity asserting he violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (“USPAP”). AM was facing damage to his professional reputation, harm to his ability to obtain work from clients, the prospect …
Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation v. BW
Facts: Our client, BW hired us to defend her behavior analyst license. Our client faced damage to her reputation, career, and livelihood. Outcome: The firm evaluated the relevant documentation and evidence and prepared a robust response based on the applicable facts and law. The response demonstrated that the Department lacked jurisdiction and authority to pursue disciplinary action. …
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- …
- 20
- Next Page »